Saturday, February 24, 2007

The paradox of veiling

The veil controversy continues - Vivien Sharp sent Karen Armstrong's article in which she argues that if ministers really want a proper debate, they must learn that where the veil is forbidden, women hasten to wear it - which, although published a couple of months back, is all the more pertinent at the moment.

Karen Armstrong. Thursday October 26, 2006The Guardian : I spent seven years of my girlhood heavily veiled - not in a Muslim niqab but in a nun's habit. We wore voluminous black robes, large rosaries and crucifixes, and an elaborate headdress: you could see a small slice of my face from the front, but from the side I was entirely shielded from view. We must have looked very odd indeed, walking dourly through the colourful carnival of London during the swinging 60s, but nobody ever asked us to exchange our habits for more conventional attire.When my order was founded in the 1840s, not long after Catholic emancipation, people were so enraged to see nuns brazenly wearing their habits in the streets that they pelted them with rotten fruit and horse dung. Nuns had been banned from Britain since the Reformation; their return seemed to herald the resurgence of barbarism. Two hundred and fifty years after the gunpowder plot,


No comments: